InfluxDB vs Parca

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureInfluxDBParca
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageRustTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 31,683★ 4,935
First released20132021
ReplacesDatadog, AWS TimestreamDatadog Profiler

Why pick each one

Choose InfluxDB if…

  • Excellent for IoT and metrics
  • Rich tooling and integrations
InfluxDB details

Choose Parca if…

  • No code changes needed
  • Low overhead
Parca details

Frequently asked questions

Is InfluxDB or Parca better?

Neither is universally better. InfluxDB has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are InfluxDB and Parca free and open-source?

Yes. InfluxDB is licensed under MIT and Parca under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run InfluxDB and Parca with Docker?

InfluxDB: yes. Parca: yes.

Related comparisons