Papercups vs Zammad

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePapercupsZammad
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageElixirRuby
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB4,096 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 6,097★ 5,834
First released20202016
ReplacesIntercom, DriftZendesk, Freshdesk

Why pick each one

Choose Papercups if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 6.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Elixir
Papercups details

Choose Zammad if…

  • Mature support workflow
  • Good integrations
Zammad details

Frequently asked questions

Is Papercups or Zammad better?

Neither is universally better. Papercups has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Papercups and Zammad free and open-source?

Yes. Papercups is licensed under MIT and Zammad under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Papercups and Zammad with Docker?

Papercups: yes. Zammad: yes.

Related comparisons