PairDrop vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePairDropSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageJavaScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 11,133★ 33,952
First released20222015
ReplacesAirDrop, WeTransferAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose PairDrop if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 11.1k GitHub stars
PairDrop details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is PairDrop or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while PairDrop is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are PairDrop and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. PairDrop is licensed under GPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run PairDrop and SeaweedFS with Docker?

PairDrop: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons