ownCloud Web vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureownCloud WebSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 567★ 33,952
First released20202015
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose ownCloud Web if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
ownCloud Web details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is ownCloud Web or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while ownCloud Web is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are ownCloud Web and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. ownCloud Web is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ownCloud Web and SeaweedFS with Docker?

ownCloud Web: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons