OroCRM vs Fat Free CRM
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted crm & business apps options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OroCRM
Open-source CRM for B2B sales teams
VS
Fat Free CRM
Ruby on Rails open-source customer relationship manager
| Feature | OroCRM | Fat Free CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CRM & Business Apps | CRM & Business Apps |
| License | OSL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 681 | ★ 3,628 |
| First released | 2014 | 2008 |
| Replaces | Salesforce, HubSpot | Salesforce |
Why pick each one
Choose OroCRM if…
- Released under the OSL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
Choose Fat Free CRM if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in Ruby
Frequently asked questions
Is OroCRM or Fat Free CRM better?
Fat Free CRM is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider OroCRM if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are OroCRM and Fat Free CRM free and open-source?
Yes. OroCRM is licensed under OSL-3.0 and Fat Free CRM under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OroCRM and Fat Free CRM with Docker?
OroCRM: yes. Fat Free CRM: yes.