Atomic CRM vs OroCRM
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted crm & business apps options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Atomic CRM
Open-source CRM built with React and Supabase
VS
OroCRM
Open-source CRM for B2B sales teams
| Feature | Atomic CRM | OroCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 83 · Excellent | 62 · Good |
| Category | CRM & Business Apps | CRM & Business Apps |
| License | MIT | OSL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,271 | ★ 685 |
| First released | 2024 | 2014 |
| Replaces | HubSpot, Pipedrive | Salesforce, HubSpot |
What are Atomic CRM and OroCRM?
Atomic CRM
Atomic CRM is an open-source CRM toolkit by Marmelab, built with React and Supabase. It manages contacts, deals, tasks, and notes with a kanban-style sales pipeline and is designed to be customized as a starter kit.
- Kanban sales pipeline
- Contact and deal management
- Tasks and notes
- Built on Supabase
OroCRM
OroCRM is an open-source customer relationship management application designed for B2B and multi-channel sales. It offers strong reporting, segmentation, and workflow automation.
- B2B sales pipeline
- Advanced segmentation
- Workflow automation
- Detailed analytics
Atomic CRM vs OroCRM: key differences
Atomic CRM is written in TypeScript, while OroCRM is built with PHP. Licensing differs — MIT for Atomic CRM versus OSL-3.0 for OroCRM. Atomic CRM is the lighter option, starting around 512 MB of RAM against 2,048 MB for OroCRM. OroCRM is the more established project (first released 2014), while Atomic CRM arrived in 2024.
Why pick each one
Choose Atomic CRM if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Choose OroCRM if…
- Released under the OSL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
Frequently asked questions
Is Atomic CRM or OroCRM better?
Atomic CRM is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider OroCRM if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Atomic CRM and OroCRM free and open-source?
Yes. Atomic CRM is licensed under MIT and OroCRM under OSL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Atomic CRM and OroCRM with Docker?
Atomic CRM: yes. OroCRM: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Atomic CRM or OroCRM?
Atomic CRM has the smaller minimum footprint at 512 MB of RAM, compared to about 2,048 MB for OroCRM. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.