OramaCore vs tinysearch
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OramaCore
Full-text, vector and hybrid search engine
VS
tinysearch
Tiny WebAssembly-powered static site search
| Feature | OramaCore | tinysearch |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Rust | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 258 | ★ 2,953 |
| First released | 2024 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Algolia, Elasticsearch | Algolia |
Why pick each one
Choose OramaCore if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Rust
Choose tinysearch if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Active community (3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is OramaCore or tinysearch better?
Neither is universally better. tinysearch has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are OramaCore and tinysearch free and open-source?
Yes. OramaCore is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and tinysearch under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OramaCore and tinysearch with Docker?
OramaCore: yes. tinysearch: check the project docs for container support.