SHSelfHostIndex

Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi vs Qdrant

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
LU Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi Full-text search server built on the Tantivy engine VS QD Qdrant High-performance open-source vector search engine
FeatureLucene Note Solr-alt ToshiQdrant
CategorySearch EnginesSearch Engines
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageRustRust
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 4,256★ 33,837
First released20182021
ReplacesElasticsearchPinecone, Algolia

Why pick each one

Choose Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi if…

  • Lightweight search server
  • Familiar API style
Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi details

Choose Qdrant if…

  • Excellent performance
  • Easy to deploy
Qdrant details

Frequently asked questions

Is Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi or Qdrant better?

Neither is universally better. Qdrant has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi and Qdrant free and open-source?

Yes. Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi is licensed under MIT and Qdrant under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi and Qdrant with Docker?

Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi: yes. Qdrant: yes.

Related comparisons