SHSelfHostIndex

Lunr.js vs Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
LU Lunr.js Small full-text search library for the browser VS LU Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi Full-text search server built on the Tantivy engine
FeatureLunr.jsLucene Note Solr-alt Toshi
CategorySearch EnginesSearch Engines
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageJavaScriptRust
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentsourcedocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 9,202★ 4,256
First released20132018
ReplacesAlgolia, ElasticsearchElasticsearch

Why pick each one

Choose Lunr.js if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 9.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
Lunr.js details

Choose Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi if…

  • Lightweight search server
  • Familiar API style
Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi details

Frequently asked questions

Is Lunr.js or Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi better?

Lunr.js is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Lunr.js and Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi free and open-source?

Yes. Lunr.js is licensed under MIT and Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Lunr.js and Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi with Docker?

Lunr.js: check the project docs for container support. Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi: yes.

Related comparisons