Elasticsearch vs Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Elasticsearch
Distributed search and analytics engine
VS
Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi
Full-text search server built on the Tantivy engine
| Feature | Elasticsearch | Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | Elastic-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Java | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 77,808 | ★ 4,256 |
| First released | 2010 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Algolia, Splunk | Elasticsearch |
Why pick each one
Choose Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi if…
- Lightweight search server
- Familiar API style
Frequently asked questions
Is Elasticsearch or Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi better?
Neither is universally better. Elasticsearch has the larger community, while Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Elasticsearch and Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi free and open-source?
Yes. Elasticsearch is licensed under Elastic-2.0 and Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Elasticsearch and Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi with Docker?
Elasticsearch: yes. Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi: yes.