OpenPaper.work vs Stirling PDF
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OpenPaper.work
Personal document scanner and indexer for paperless homes
VS
Stirling PDF
Powerful locally hosted web-based PDF toolkit
| Feature | OpenPaper.work | Stirling PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | source, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,400 | ★ 89,077 |
| First released | 2014 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Evernote | Adobe Acrobat, Smallpdf |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenPaper.work or Stirling PDF better?
Stirling PDF is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider OpenPaper.work if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are OpenPaper.work and Stirling PDF free and open-source?
Yes. OpenPaper.work is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Stirling PDF under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenPaper.work and Stirling PDF with Docker?
OpenPaper.work: check the project docs for container support. Stirling PDF: yes.