OpenPaper.work vs Plone
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OpenPaper.work
Personal document scanner and indexer for paperless homes
VS
Plone
Enterprise CMS and document repository with strong security
| Feature | OpenPaper.work | Plone |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | source, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,400 | ★ 310 |
| First released | 2014 | 2001 |
| Replaces | Evernote | SharePoint |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenPaper.work or Plone better?
OpenPaper.work is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Plone if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are OpenPaper.work and Plone free and open-source?
Yes. OpenPaper.work is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Plone under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenPaper.work and Plone with Docker?
OpenPaper.work: check the project docs for container support. Plone: yes.