Open Archiver vs pgBackWeb
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Open Archiver
Email archiving solution with full-text search and eDiscovery search
VS
pgBackWeb
Web interface for scheduling PostgreSQL backups
| Feature | Open Archiver | pgBackWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,224 | ★ 2,615 |
| First released | 2026 | 2024 |
| Replaces | — | AWS RDS Backups |
Why pick each one
Choose Open Archiver if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Choose pgBackWeb if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Open Archiver or pgBackWeb better?
pgBackWeb is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Open Archiver if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Open Archiver and pgBackWeb free and open-source?
Yes. Open Archiver is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and pgBackWeb under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Open Archiver and pgBackWeb with Docker?
Open Archiver: yes. pgBackWeb: yes.