BorgBackup vs pgBackWeb
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
BorgBackup
Deduplicating archiver with compression and encryption
VS
pgBackWeb
Web interface for scheduling PostgreSQL backups
| Feature | BorgBackup | pgBackWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,588 | ★ 2,615 |
| First released | 2015 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Carbonite, Backblaze | AWS RDS Backups |
Why pick each one
Choose pgBackWeb if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is BorgBackup or pgBackWeb better?
Neither is universally better. BorgBackup has the larger community, while pgBackWeb is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are BorgBackup and pgBackWeb free and open-source?
Yes. BorgBackup is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and pgBackWeb under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run BorgBackup and pgBackWeb with Docker?
BorgBackup: check the project docs for container support. pgBackWeb: yes.