bitmagnet vs Open Archiver
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
bitmagnet
BitTorrent indexer, DHT crawler, content classifier and torrent search
VS
Open Archiver
Email archiving solution with full-text search and eDiscovery search
| Feature | bitmagnet | Open Archiver |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,265 | ★ 2,224 |
| First released | 2026 | 2026 |
| Replaces | — | — |
Why pick each one
Choose bitmagnet if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Choose Open Archiver if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is bitmagnet or Open Archiver better?
Neither is universally better. bitmagnet has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are bitmagnet and Open Archiver free and open-source?
Yes. bitmagnet is licensed under MIT and Open Archiver under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run bitmagnet and Open Archiver with Docker?
bitmagnet: yes. Open Archiver: yes.