bitmagnet vs pgBackWeb
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
bitmagnet
BitTorrent indexer, DHT crawler, content classifier and torrent search
VS
pgBackWeb
Web interface for scheduling PostgreSQL backups
| Feature | bitmagnet | pgBackWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,265 | ★ 2,615 |
| First released | 2026 | 2024 |
| Replaces | — | AWS RDS Backups |
Why pick each one
Choose bitmagnet if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Choose pgBackWeb if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is bitmagnet or pgBackWeb better?
Neither is universally better. bitmagnet has the larger community, while pgBackWeb is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are bitmagnet and pgBackWeb free and open-source?
Yes. bitmagnet is licensed under MIT and pgBackWeb under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run bitmagnet and pgBackWeb with Docker?
bitmagnet: yes. pgBackWeb: yes.