Oncall vs Uptime Kuma

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOncallUptime Kuma
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseBSD-2-ClauseMIT
LanguagePythonJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 1,256★ 89,960
First released20172021
ReplacesPagerDutyPingdom, UptimeRobot

Why pick each one

Choose Oncall if…

  • Simple scheduling model
  • Battle-tested at LinkedIn
Oncall details

Choose Uptime Kuma if…

  • Very easy to use
  • Great notifications
  • Lightweight
Uptime Kuma details

Frequently asked questions

Is Oncall or Uptime Kuma better?

Uptime Kuma is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Oncall if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Oncall and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?

Yes. Oncall is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Oncall and Uptime Kuma with Docker?

Oncall: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.

Related comparisons