Grafana k6 vs Oncall

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana k6Oncall
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0BSD-2-Clause
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 31,211★ 1,256
First released20172017
ReplacesLoadRunner, BlazeMeterPagerDuty

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana k6 if…

  • Developer-friendly scripting
  • Great CI integration
Grafana k6 details

Choose Oncall if…

  • Simple scheduling model
  • Battle-tested at LinkedIn
Oncall details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana k6 or Oncall better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana k6 has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Grafana k6 and Oncall free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana k6 is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Oncall under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana k6 and Oncall with Docker?

Grafana k6: yes. Oncall: yes.

Related comparisons