Offen Fair Web Analytics vs Umami
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Offen Fair Web Analytics | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 46 · Fair | 99 · Excellent |
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 981 | ★ 38,981 |
| First released | 2019 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Google Analytics |
What are Offen Fair Web Analytics and Umami?
Offen Fair Web Analytics
Offen Fair Web Analytics is a privacy-focused analytics tool that gives website operators insights while letting visitors see and delete their own data. It is transparent and consent-based.
- Visitor data transparency
- End-to-end encrypted data
- Consent-based tracking
- Users can delete their data
Umami
Umami is a simple, fast, privacy-focused alternative to Google Analytics that collects no personal data and uses no cookies. It targets developers and site owners wanting easy, ethical analytics. It is deployed via Docker.
- Cookie-free privacy analytics
- Clean modern dashboard
- Multi-site and multi-user
- Tiny tracking script
Offen Fair Web Analytics vs Umami: key differences
Offen Fair Web Analytics is written in JavaScript, while Umami is built with TypeScript. Licensing differs — Apache-2.0 for Offen Fair Web Analytics versus MIT for Umami. Offen Fair Web Analytics is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Umami. Umami has the considerably larger community, at 38,981 GitHub stars versus 981.
Why pick each one
Choose Offen Fair Web Analytics if…
- Exceptionally privacy-respecting
- Builds visitor trust
Watch out for
- Less mainstream
- Consent UI changes metrics
Choose Umami if…
- Very easy to self-host
- Privacy-friendly
- Clean interface
Watch out for
- Fewer features than Matomo
- Requires a database
Frequently asked questions
Is Offen Fair Web Analytics or Umami better?
Umami is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Offen Fair Web Analytics if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Offen Fair Web Analytics and Umami free and open-source?
Yes. Offen Fair Web Analytics is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Umami under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Offen Fair Web Analytics and Umami with Docker?
Offen Fair Web Analytics: yes. Umami: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Offen Fair Web Analytics or Umami?
Offen Fair Web Analytics has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Umami. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.
Related comparisons
- Offen Fair Web Analytics vs Ackee
- Umami vs Ackee
- Offen Fair Web Analytics vs Counterscale
- Umami vs Counterscale
- Offen Fair Web Analytics vs Fathom Lite
- Umami vs Fathom Lite
- Offen Fair Web Analytics vs GoatCounter
- Umami vs GoatCounter
- Offen Fair Web Analytics vs Counter.dev Selfhost
- Umami vs Counter.dev Selfhost