TimeOff Management vs Titra
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
TimeOff Management
Self-hosted leave and absence tracking for companies
VS
Titra
Fast time tracking for freelancers and small teams
| Feature | TimeOff Management | Titra |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,041 | ★ 496 |
| First released | 2015 | 2019 |
| Replaces | BambooHR, Vacation Tracker | Toggl, Harvest, Clockify |
Why pick each one
Choose TimeOff Management if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Choose Titra if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is TimeOff Management or Titra better?
Neither is universally better. TimeOff Management has the larger community, while Titra is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are TimeOff Management and Titra free and open-source?
Yes. TimeOff Management is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and Titra under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run TimeOff Management and Titra with Docker?
TimeOff Management: yes. Titra: yes.