SHSelfHostIndex

Anuko Time Tracker vs TimeOff Management

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
AN Anuko Time Tracker Simple multi-user web time tracking system VS TI TimeOff Management Self-hosted leave and absence tracking for companies
FeatureAnuko Time TrackerTimeOff Management
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseGPL-3.0BSD-2-Clause
LanguagePHPJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 207★ 1,041
First released20032015
ReplacesClockify, HarvestBambooHR, Vacation Tracker

Why pick each one

Choose Anuko Time Tracker if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in PHP
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Anuko Time Tracker details

Choose TimeOff Management if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
TimeOff Management details

Frequently asked questions

Is Anuko Time Tracker or TimeOff Management better?

Neither is universally better. TimeOff Management has the larger community, while Anuko Time Tracker is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Anuko Time Tracker and TimeOff Management free and open-source?

Yes. Anuko Time Tracker is licensed under GPL-3.0 and TimeOff Management under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Anuko Time Tracker and TimeOff Management with Docker?

Anuko Time Tracker: check the project docs for container support. TimeOff Management: yes.

Related comparisons