October CMS vs SPIP
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
October CMS
Laravel-based CMS focused on simplicity for developers
VS
SPIP
CMS with a focus on collaborative edition and multilingualism
| Feature | October CMS | SPIP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0-or-later |
| Language | PHP | |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,140 | — |
| First released | 2014 | 2023 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Wix | Blogger, Coldfusion, Wix |
Why pick each one
Choose October CMS if…
- Great for Laravel developers
- Simple, transparent architecture
Choose SPIP if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0-or-later license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is October CMS or SPIP better?
Neither is universally better. October CMS has the larger community, while SPIP is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are October CMS and SPIP free and open-source?
Yes. October CMS is licensed under MIT and SPIP under GPL-3.0-or-later. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run October CMS and SPIP with Docker?
October CMS: yes. SPIP: check the project docs for container support.