Anchor CMS vs October CMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Anchor CMS
Lightweight blogging-focused CMS
VS
October CMS
Laravel-based CMS focused on simplicity for developers
| Feature | Anchor CMS | October CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,298 | ★ 11,140 |
| First released | 2012 | 2014 |
| Replaces | WordPress | WordPress, Wix |
Why pick each one
Choose October CMS if…
- Great for Laravel developers
- Simple, transparent architecture
Frequently asked questions
Is Anchor CMS or October CMS better?
Neither is universally better. October CMS has the larger community, while Anchor CMS is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Anchor CMS and October CMS free and open-source?
Yes. Anchor CMS is licensed under GPL-3.0 and October CMS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Anchor CMS and October CMS with Docker?
Anchor CMS: yes. October CMS: yes.