Fork CMS vs October CMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Fork CMS
User-friendly CMS aimed at content editors
VS
October CMS
Laravel-based CMS focused on simplicity for developers
| Feature | Fork CMS | October CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,172 | ★ 11,140 |
| First released | 2010 | 2014 |
| Replaces | WordPress | WordPress, Wix |
Why pick each one
Choose October CMS if…
- Great for Laravel developers
- Simple, transparent architecture
Frequently asked questions
Is Fork CMS or October CMS better?
Neither is universally better. October CMS has the larger community, while Fork CMS is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Fork CMS and October CMS free and open-source?
Yes. Fork CMS is licensed under MIT and October CMS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Fork CMS and October CMS with Docker?
Fork CMS: yes. October CMS: yes.