Fork CMS vs October CMS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFork CMSOctober CMS
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score26 · At risk93 · Excellent
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseMITMIT
LanguagePHPPHP
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 1,171★ 11,147
First released20102014
ReplacesWordPressWordPress, Wix

What are Fork CMS and October CMS?

Fork CMS

Fork CMS is an open-source content management system built on Symfony components, designed to be easy for content editors while remaining flexible for developers. It includes built-in SEO and analytics modules.

  • Editor-friendly interface
  • Built-in SEO module
  • Analytics integration
  • Multilingual support

Read the full Fork CMS guide →

October CMS

October CMS is a self-hosted content management system built on the Laravel framework, designed to make web development simple again. It uses flat-file templating with a clean backend for content editors.

  • Built on Laravel
  • Flat-file twig-style templating
  • Plugin marketplace
  • Clean developer experience

Read the full October CMS guide →

Fork CMS vs October CMS: key differences

Both projects are written in PHP. Fork CMS is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 512 MB for October CMS. Fork CMS is the more established project (first released 2010), while October CMS arrived in 2014. October CMS has the considerably larger community, at 11,147 GitHub stars versus 1,171.

Why pick each one

Choose Fork CMS if…

  • Easy for non-technical users
  • Good built-in modules

Watch out for

  • Smaller community
  • Slower development pace
Fork CMS details

Choose October CMS if…

  • Great for Laravel developers
  • Simple, transparent architecture

Watch out for

  • Some plugins are paid
  • Less suited to non-developers
October CMS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Fork CMS or October CMS better?

Neither is universally better. October CMS has the larger community, while Fork CMS is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Fork CMS and October CMS free and open-source?

Yes. Fork CMS is licensed under MIT and October CMS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Fork CMS and October CMS with Docker?

Fork CMS: yes. October CMS: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Fork CMS or October CMS?

Fork CMS has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for October CMS. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons