Backup tool nono Plakar vs Velero
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Backup tool nono Plakar
Effortless backup with built-in verification and UI
VS
Velero
Backup and migrate Kubernetes cluster resources
| Feature | Backup tool nono Plakar | Velero |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | ISC | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,013 | ★ 10,187 |
| First released | 2021 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, CrashPlan | Kasten K10 |
Why pick each one
Choose Backup tool nono Plakar if…
- Released under the ISC license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Choose Velero if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 10.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Backup tool nono Plakar or Velero better?
Neither is universally better. Velero has the larger community, while Backup tool nono Plakar is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Backup tool nono Plakar and Velero free and open-source?
Yes. Backup tool nono Plakar is licensed under ISC and Velero under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Backup tool nono Plakar and Velero with Docker?
Backup tool nono Plakar: yes. Velero: check the project docs for container support.