Backup tool nono Plakar vs Deja Dup
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Backup tool nono Plakar
Effortless backup with built-in verification and UI
VS
Deja Dup
Simple backup tool for the GNOME desktop
| Feature | Backup tool nono Plakar | Deja Dup |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | ISC | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Vala |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,013 | ★ 600 |
| First released | 2021 | 2008 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, CrashPlan | Time Machine, Backblaze |
Why pick each one
Choose Backup tool nono Plakar if…
- Released under the ISC license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Choose Deja Dup if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Vala
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Backup tool nono Plakar or Deja Dup better?
Neither is universally better. Backup tool nono Plakar has the larger community, while Deja Dup is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Backup tool nono Plakar and Deja Dup free and open-source?
Yes. Backup tool nono Plakar is licensed under ISC and Deja Dup under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Backup tool nono Plakar and Deja Dup with Docker?
Backup tool nono Plakar: yes. Deja Dup: check the project docs for container support.