SHSelfHostIndex

Backup tool nono Plakar vs Restic Mailer

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
BA Backup tool nono Plakar Effortless backup with built-in verification and UI VS RE Restic Mailer Notification wrapper for restic backup jobs
FeatureBackup tool nono PlakarRestic Mailer
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseISCMIT
LanguageGoShell
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 2,013★ 661
First released20212018
ReplacesBackblaze, CrashPlanBackblaze

Why pick each one

Choose Backup tool nono Plakar if…

  • Released under the ISC license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
Backup tool nono Plakar details

Choose Restic Mailer if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Shell
Restic Mailer details

Frequently asked questions

Is Backup tool nono Plakar or Restic Mailer better?

Neither is universally better. Backup tool nono Plakar has the larger community, while Restic Mailer is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Backup tool nono Plakar and Restic Mailer free and open-source?

Yes. Backup tool nono Plakar is licensed under ISC and Restic Mailer under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Backup tool nono Plakar and Restic Mailer with Docker?

Backup tool nono Plakar: yes. Restic Mailer: yes.

Related comparisons