node-oidc-provider vs SimpleSAMLphp

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurenode-oidc-providerSimpleSAMLphp
CategoryIdentity & SSOIdentity & SSO
LicenseMITLGPL-2.1
LanguageJavaScriptPHP
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentsource, dockerbare-metal, source, docker
GitHub stars★ 3,788★ 1,139
First released20162007
ReplacesAuth0, OktaOkta, PingFederate

Why pick each one

Choose node-oidc-provider if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
node-oidc-provider details

Choose SimpleSAMLphp if…

  • Proven and widely deployed
  • Flexible modules
SimpleSAMLphp details

Frequently asked questions

Is node-oidc-provider or SimpleSAMLphp better?

Neither is universally better. node-oidc-provider has the larger community, while SimpleSAMLphp is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are node-oidc-provider and SimpleSAMLphp free and open-source?

Yes. node-oidc-provider is licensed under MIT and SimpleSAMLphp under LGPL-2.1. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run node-oidc-provider and SimpleSAMLphp with Docker?

node-oidc-provider: yes. SimpleSAMLphp: yes.

Related comparisons