2FAuth vs node-oidc-provider

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Feature2FAuthnode-oidc-provider
CategoryIdentity & SSOIdentity & SSO
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePHPJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcesource, docker
GitHub stars★ 4,090★ 3,788
First released20202016
ReplacesAuthy, Google AuthenticatorAuth0, Okta

Why pick each one

Choose 2FAuth if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4.1k GitHub stars)
2FAuth details

Choose node-oidc-provider if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
node-oidc-provider details

Frequently asked questions

Is 2FAuth or node-oidc-provider better?

2FAuth is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider node-oidc-provider if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are 2FAuth and node-oidc-provider free and open-source?

Yes. 2FAuth is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and node-oidc-provider under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run 2FAuth and node-oidc-provider with Docker?

2FAuth: yes. node-oidc-provider: yes.

Related comparisons