Cerbos vs node-oidc-provider

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCerbosnode-oidc-provider
CategoryIdentity & SSOIdentity & SSO
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarysource, docker
GitHub stars★ 4,529★ 3,788
First released20212016
ReplacesAuth0 FGA, OPAAuth0, Okta

Why pick each one

Choose Cerbos if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Active community (4.5k GitHub stars)
Cerbos details

Choose node-oidc-provider if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
node-oidc-provider details

Frequently asked questions

Is Cerbos or node-oidc-provider better?

Cerbos is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider node-oidc-provider if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Cerbos and node-oidc-provider free and open-source?

Yes. Cerbos is licensed under Apache-2.0 and node-oidc-provider under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Cerbos and node-oidc-provider with Docker?

Cerbos: yes. node-oidc-provider: yes.

Related comparisons