authentik vs node-oidc-provider
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
authentik
Open-source identity provider with proxy outpost
VS
node-oidc-provider
Certified OpenID Connect and OAuth 2.0 provider for Node.js
| Feature | authentik | node-oidc-provider |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Identity & SSO |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | source, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 23,666 | ★ 3,788 |
| First released | 2020 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Okta, Auth0 | Auth0, Okta |
Why pick each one
Choose authentik if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 23.7k GitHub stars
Choose node-oidc-provider if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is authentik or node-oidc-provider better?
authentik is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider node-oidc-provider if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are authentik and node-oidc-provider free and open-source?
Yes. authentik is licensed under MIT and node-oidc-provider under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run authentik and node-oidc-provider with Docker?
authentik: yes. node-oidc-provider: yes.