node-oidc-provider vs Rauthy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurenode-oidc-providerRauthy
CategoryIdentity & SSOIdentity & SSO
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageJavaScriptRust
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentsource, dockerdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 3,788★ 1,256
First released20162023
ReplacesAuth0, OktaKeycloak, Auth0

Why pick each one

Choose node-oidc-provider if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
node-oidc-provider details

Choose Rauthy if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Rust
Rauthy details

Frequently asked questions

Is node-oidc-provider or Rauthy better?

Neither is universally better. node-oidc-provider has the larger community, while Rauthy is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are node-oidc-provider and Rauthy free and open-source?

Yes. node-oidc-provider is licensed under MIT and Rauthy under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run node-oidc-provider and Rauthy with Docker?

node-oidc-provider: yes. Rauthy: yes.

Related comparisons