Authorizer vs Rauthy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Authorizer
Open-source auth solution with a ready-made UI
VS
Rauthy
Lightweight OpenID Connect provider written in Rust
| Feature | Authorizer | Rauthy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,977 | ★ 1,256 |
| First released | 2021 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Auth0, Firebase Authentication | Keycloak, Auth0 |
Why pick each one
Choose Authorizer if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
Choose Rauthy if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Rust
Frequently asked questions
Is Authorizer or Rauthy better?
Authorizer is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Rauthy if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Authorizer and Rauthy free and open-source?
Yes. Authorizer is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Rauthy under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Authorizer and Rauthy with Docker?
Authorizer: yes. Rauthy: yes.