node-oidc-provider vs Pocket ID
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
node-oidc-provider
Certified OpenID Connect and OAuth 2.0 provider for Node.js
VS
Pocket ID
Simple OIDC provider that uses only passkeys
| Feature | node-oidc-provider | Pocket ID |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Language | JavaScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | source, docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,788 | ★ 8,737 |
| First released | 2016 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Auth0, Okta | Auth0, Authelia |
Why pick each one
Choose node-oidc-provider if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Choose Pocket ID if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 8.7k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is node-oidc-provider or Pocket ID better?
Pocket ID is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider node-oidc-provider if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are node-oidc-provider and Pocket ID free and open-source?
Yes. node-oidc-provider is licensed under MIT and Pocket ID under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run node-oidc-provider and Pocket ID with Docker?
node-oidc-provider: yes. Pocket ID: yes.