Authorizer vs Pocket ID
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Authorizer
Open-source auth solution with a ready-made UI
VS
Pocket ID
Simple OIDC provider that uses only passkeys
| Feature | Authorizer | Pocket ID |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,977 | ★ 8,737 |
| First released | 2021 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Auth0, Firebase Authentication | Auth0, Authelia |
Why pick each one
Choose Authorizer if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
Choose Pocket ID if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 8.7k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Authorizer or Pocket ID better?
Neither is universally better. Pocket ID has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Authorizer and Pocket ID free and open-source?
Yes. Authorizer is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Pocket ID under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Authorizer and Pocket ID with Docker?
Authorizer: yes. Pocket ID: yes.