node-oidc-provider vs Ory Oathkeeper

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurenode-oidc-providerOry Oathkeeper
CategoryIdentity & SSOIdentity & SSO
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageJavaScriptGo
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentsource, dockerdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 3,788★ 3,590
First released20162017
ReplacesAuth0, OktaCloudflare Access

Why pick each one

Choose node-oidc-provider if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
node-oidc-provider details

Choose Ory Oathkeeper if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
Ory Oathkeeper details

Frequently asked questions

Is node-oidc-provider or Ory Oathkeeper better?

Neither is universally better. node-oidc-provider has the larger community, while Ory Oathkeeper is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are node-oidc-provider and Ory Oathkeeper free and open-source?

Yes. node-oidc-provider is licensed under MIT and Ory Oathkeeper under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run node-oidc-provider and Ory Oathkeeper with Docker?

node-oidc-provider: yes. Ory Oathkeeper: yes.

Related comparisons