ngIRCd vs Chatwoot

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturengIRCdChatwoot
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseGPL-2.0MIT
LanguageCRuby
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM32 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker, kubernetes, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 574★ 35,596
First released20012019
ReplacesSlackIntercom, Zendesk, Drift

Why pick each one

Choose ngIRCd if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in C
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 32 MB RAM
ngIRCd details

Choose Chatwoot if…

  • Polished customer support workflow
  • Active development
Chatwoot details

Frequently asked questions

Is ngIRCd or Chatwoot better?

Neither is universally better. Chatwoot has the larger community, while ngIRCd is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are ngIRCd and Chatwoot free and open-source?

Yes. ngIRCd is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Chatwoot under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ngIRCd and Chatwoot with Docker?

ngIRCd: check the project docs for container support. Chatwoot: yes.

Related comparisons