Floccus vs Wiki.js
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Floccus
Sync your browser bookmarks across browsers and devices
VS
Wiki.js
Modern and powerful open-source wiki
| Feature | Floccus | Wiki.js |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Notes & Knowledge Base |
| License | MPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Vue |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,322 | ★ 28,727 |
| First released | 2015 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Raindrop.io, Chrome Sync | Confluence, Notion |
Why pick each one
Choose Floccus if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 8.3k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Choose Wiki.js if…
- Flexible and full-featured
- Many auth options
- Good content management
Frequently asked questions
Is Floccus or Wiki.js better?
Neither is universally better. Wiki.js has the larger community, while Floccus is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Floccus and Wiki.js free and open-source?
Yes. Floccus is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Wiki.js under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Floccus and Wiki.js with Docker?
Floccus: check the project docs for container support. Wiki.js: yes.