Floccus vs Wallabag
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Floccus
Sync your browser bookmarks across browsers and devices
VS
Wallabag
Self-hosted read-it-later application
| Feature | Floccus | Wallabag |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,322 | ★ 12,884 |
| First released | 2015 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Raindrop.io, Chrome Sync | Pocket, Instapaper |
Why pick each one
Choose Floccus if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 8.3k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Choose Wallabag if…
- Great read-it-later experience
- Own your reading list
- Apps available
Frequently asked questions
Is Floccus or Wallabag better?
Neither is universally better. Wallabag has the larger community, while Floccus is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Floccus and Wallabag free and open-source?
Yes. Floccus is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Wallabag under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Floccus and Wallabag with Docker?
Floccus: check the project docs for container support. Wallabag: yes.