Floccus vs Winds
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Floccus
Sync your browser bookmarks across browsers and devices
VS
Winds
Beautiful open-source RSS and podcast application
| Feature | Floccus | Winds |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,322 | ★ 9,115 |
| First released | 2015 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Raindrop.io, Chrome Sync | Feedly |
Why pick each one
Choose Floccus if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 8.3k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Choose Winds if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 9.1k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Floccus or Winds better?
Neither is universally better. Winds has the larger community, while Floccus is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Floccus and Winds free and open-source?
Yes. Floccus is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Winds under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Floccus and Winds with Docker?
Floccus: check the project docs for container support. Winds: yes.