NetBird vs WG-Easy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNetBirdWG-Easy
CategoryRemote Access & VPNRemote Access & VPN
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseAGPL-3.0
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 28,139★ 26,595
First released20212021
ReplacesTailscale, ZeroTierOpenVPN Access Server

Why pick each one

Choose NetBird if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 28.1k GitHub stars
NetBird details

Choose WG-Easy if…

  • Extremely easy setup
  • Friendly UI
WG-Easy details

Frequently asked questions

Is NetBird or WG-Easy better?

Neither is universally better. NetBird has the larger community, while WG-Easy is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are NetBird and WG-Easy free and open-source?

Yes. NetBird is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and WG-Easy under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run NetBird and WG-Easy with Docker?

NetBird: yes. WG-Easy: yes.

Related comparisons