bore vs NetBird
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
bore
Modern, simple TCP tunnel in Rust
VS
NetBird
Connect devices into a secure WireGuard-based overlay network
| Feature | bore | NetBird |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | Rust | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,363 | ★ 28,139 |
| First released | 2022 | 2021 |
| Replaces | ngrok | Tailscale, ZeroTier |
Why pick each one
Choose bore if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 11.4k GitHub stars
Choose NetBird if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 28.1k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is bore or NetBird better?
Neither is universally better. NetBird has the larger community, while bore is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are bore and NetBird free and open-source?
Yes. bore is licensed under MIT and NetBird under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run bore and NetBird with Docker?
bore: yes. NetBird: yes.