MySQL Backup Container vs Rclone
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
MySQL Backup Container
Scheduled MySQL and MariaDB dump container
VS
Rclone
Sync and copy files to dozens of cloud providers
| Feature | MySQL Backup Container | Rclone |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | binary, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 758 | ★ 58,995 |
| First released | 2016 | 2014 |
| Replaces | AWS RDS Backups | Backblaze |
Why pick each one
Choose MySQL Backup Container if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is MySQL Backup Container or Rclone better?
Neither is universally better. Rclone has the larger community, while MySQL Backup Container is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are MySQL Backup Container and Rclone free and open-source?
Yes. MySQL Backup Container is licensed under MIT and Rclone under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run MySQL Backup Container and Rclone with Docker?
MySQL Backup Container: yes. Rclone: yes.