CKAN vs Rclone

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCKANRclone
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 5,088★ 58,995
First released20262014
ReplacesBackblaze

Why pick each one

Choose CKAN if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
CKAN details

Choose Rclone if…

  • Works with almost any cloud
  • Extremely versatile
  • Reliable
Rclone details

Frequently asked questions

Is CKAN or Rclone better?

Neither is universally better. Rclone has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are CKAN and Rclone free and open-source?

Yes. CKAN is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Rclone under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CKAN and Rclone with Docker?

CKAN: check the project docs for container support. Rclone: yes.

Related comparisons