CKAN vs MySQL Backup Container
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | CKAN | MySQL Backup Container |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,088 | ★ 758 |
| First released | 2026 | 2016 |
| Replaces | — | AWS RDS Backups |
Why pick each one
Choose CKAN if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose MySQL Backup Container if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is CKAN or MySQL Backup Container better?
Neither is universally better. CKAN has the larger community, while MySQL Backup Container is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are CKAN and MySQL Backup Container free and open-source?
Yes. CKAN is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and MySQL Backup Container under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CKAN and MySQL Backup Container with Docker?
CKAN: check the project docs for container support. MySQL Backup Container: yes.