MyPhotoShare vs Sigal
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | MyPhotoShare | Sigal |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Read-the-docs project | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 0 · At risk | 78 · Good |
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 15 | ★ 945 |
| First released | 2014 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Google Photos, Flickr | Flickr |
What are MyPhotoShare and Sigal?
MyPhotoShare
MyPhotoShare is a self-hosted, lightweight photo gallery generator that creates a static web gallery from a folder of photos and videos. It produces a fast, responsive browsing experience with no database or server-side code needed.
- Static photo gallery generator
- No database needed
- Responsive browsing
- Video support
Sigal
Sigal is a simple static gallery generator that builds a browsable photo and video website from a folder of images. The output is plain HTML and works with several themes.
- Static gallery generation
- Multiple themes
- Plugin system
- Video thumbnail support
MyPhotoShare vs Sigal: key differences
Both projects are written in JavaScript. Licensing differs — GPL-3.0 for MyPhotoShare versus MIT for Sigal. Sigal is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for MyPhotoShare. Sigal is the more established project (first released 2012), while MyPhotoShare arrived in 2014. Sigal has the considerably larger community, at 945 GitHub stars versus 15.
Why pick each one
Choose MyPhotoShare if…
- Fast static output
- Low maintenance
Watch out for
- No upload interface
- Regeneration required for changes
Choose Sigal if…
- Very lightweight
- Easy to host
Watch out for
- No uploads or editing
- Static output only
Frequently asked questions
Is MyPhotoShare or Sigal better?
Sigal is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider MyPhotoShare if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are MyPhotoShare and Sigal free and open-source?
Yes. MyPhotoShare is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Sigal under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run MyPhotoShare and Sigal with Docker?
MyPhotoShare: check the project docs for container support. Sigal: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, MyPhotoShare or Sigal?
Sigal has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for MyPhotoShare. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.