fgallery vs Sigal
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | fgallery | Sigal |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Read-the-docs project | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 9 · At risk | 78 · Good |
| Status | Archived | Actively maintained |
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 248 | ★ 945 |
| First released | 2013 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Flickr, Google Photos | Flickr |
What are fgallery and Sigal?
fgallery
fgallery is a static photo gallery generator that produces a minimalist, self-contained HTML gallery from a folder of images. The generated gallery is fully static, privacy-respecting, and can be hosted on any web server.
- Minimalist static galleries
- Self-contained output
- Mobile friendly
- No tracking
Sigal
Sigal is a simple static gallery generator that builds a browsable photo and video website from a folder of images. The output is plain HTML and works with several themes.
- Static gallery generation
- Multiple themes
- Plugin system
- Video thumbnail support
fgallery vs Sigal: key differences
The biggest difference is maintenance: fgallery's repository is archived and no longer developed, while Sigal is actively maintained. Both projects are written in JavaScript. Sigal has the considerably larger community, at 945 GitHub stars versus 248.
Why pick each one
Choose fgallery if…
- Clean simple design
- Privacy respecting
Watch out for
- Command-line only
- Minimal features
Choose Sigal if…
- Very lightweight
- Easy to host
Watch out for
- No uploads or editing
- Static output only
Frequently asked questions
Is fgallery or Sigal better?
Neither is universally better. Sigal has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are fgallery and Sigal free and open-source?
Yes. fgallery is licensed under MIT and Sigal under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run fgallery and Sigal with Docker?
fgallery: check the project docs for container support. Sigal: check the project docs for container support.