motionEye vs rpisurv
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
motionEye
Web frontend for the Motion video surveillance program
VS
rpisurv
Raspberry Pi surveillance video wall for IP cameras
| Feature | motionEye | rpisurv |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,651 | ★ 661 |
| First released | 2013 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Nest Cam | Blue Iris display |
Why pick each one
Choose rpisurv if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is motionEye or rpisurv better?
motionEye is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider rpisurv if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are motionEye and rpisurv free and open-source?
Yes. motionEye is licensed under GPL-3.0 and rpisurv under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run motionEye and rpisurv with Docker?
motionEye: yes. rpisurv: check the project docs for container support.