SHSelfHostIndex

Minarca Backup vs Backup tool nono Plakar

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
MI Minarca Backup Centralized rdiff-backup with self-service restore VS BA Backup tool nono Plakar Effortless backup with built-in verification and UI
FeatureMinarca BackupBackup tool nono Plakar
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseAGPL-3.0ISC
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 239★ 2,013
First released20162021
ReplacesCrashPlan, VeeamBackblaze, CrashPlan

Why pick each one

Choose Minarca Backup if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Minarca Backup details

Choose Backup tool nono Plakar if…

  • Released under the ISC license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
Backup tool nono Plakar details

Frequently asked questions

Is Minarca Backup or Backup tool nono Plakar better?

Neither is universally better. Backup tool nono Plakar has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Minarca Backup and Backup tool nono Plakar free and open-source?

Yes. Minarca Backup is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Backup tool nono Plakar under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Minarca Backup and Backup tool nono Plakar with Docker?

Minarca Backup: yes. Backup tool nono Plakar: yes.

Related comparisons