Microweber vs Pagekit

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMicroweberPagekit
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score79 · Good15 · At risk
StatusActively maintainedArchived
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageHTMLPHP
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 3,439★ 5,454
First released20132014
ReplacesWordPress, WixWordPress

What are Microweber and Pagekit?

Microweber

Microweber is an open-source drag-and-drop website builder and content management system that includes blogging and e-commerce features. It uses a live editing interface so content can be arranged visually on the page.

  • Live drag-and-drop editing
  • Built-in online store
  • Blogging module
  • Template marketplace

Pagekit

Pagekit is a modular, open-source content management system with a clean, modern interface built on Symfony components and Vue.js. It includes a blog and a marketplace for extensions.

  • Modern Vue.js interface
  • Modular architecture
  • Built-in blog
  • Marketplace for extensions

Microweber vs Pagekit: key differences

The biggest difference is maintenance: Pagekit's repository is archived and no longer developed, while Microweber is actively maintained. Microweber is written in HTML, while Pagekit is built with PHP. Pagekit is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Microweber.

Why pick each one

Choose Microweber if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.4k GitHub stars)
  • Written in HTML
Microweber details

Choose Pagekit if…

  • Clean, modern admin
  • Lightweight

Watch out for

  • Development has stalled
  • Limited active maintenance
Pagekit details

Frequently asked questions

Is Microweber or Pagekit better?

Pagekit is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Pagekit if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Microweber and Pagekit free and open-source?

Yes. Microweber is licensed under MIT and Pagekit under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Microweber and Pagekit with Docker?

Microweber: yes. Pagekit: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Microweber or Pagekit?

Pagekit has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Microweber. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons